NYLogic

Let $n \lt \omega$ and $\Gamma$ either $\Pi$ or $\Sigma$. An ordinal $\alpha$ is called $\Gamma^1_n$-reflecting if for each $\beta \lt\alpha$ and each $\Gamma^1_n$-formula $\varphi$ if $L_\alpha \models \varphi(\beta)$ then there is a $\gamma \in (\beta, \alpha)$ so that $L_\gamma \models \varphi(\beta)$ where here $\models$ refers to full second order logic. The least $\Sigma^1_n$-reflecting ordinal is called $\sigma^1_n$ and the least $\Pi^1_n$-ordinal is called $\pi^1_n$. These ordinals provably exist and are countable (for all $n \lt \omega$). They arise naturally in proof theory, particularly in calibrating consistency strength of strong arithmetics and weak set theories. Moreover, surprisingly, their relation to one another relies heavily on the background set theory. If $V=L$ then for all $n \lt \omega$ we have $\sigma^1_{n+3} \lt \pi^1_{n+3}$ (due to Cutland) while under PD for all $n \lt \omega$ we have $\sigma^1_n \lt \pi^1_n$ if and only if $n$ is even (due to Kechris).
Surprisingly nothing was known about these ordinals in any model which satisfies neither $V=L$ nor PD. In this talk I will sketch some recent results which aim at rectifying this. In particular we will show that in any generic extension by any number of Cohen or Random reals, a Sacks, Miller or Laver real, or any lightface, weakly homogeneous Borel ccc forcing notion agrees with $L$ about which ordinals are $\Gamma^1_n$-reflecting (for any $n$ and $\Gamma$). Meanwhile, in the generic extension by collapsing $\omega_1$ many interesting things happen, not least amongst them that $\sigma^1_n$ and $\pi^1_n$ are increased - yet still below $\omega_1^L$ for $n > 2$. Along the way we will discuss the plethora of open problems in this area. This is joint work with Juan Aguilera.

Video

(One version of) Cantor's second best theorem states that every pair of countable, dense sets of reals are isomorphic as linear orders. From the perspective of set theory it's natural to ask whether some variant of this theorem can hold consistently when 'countable' is replaced by 'uncountable'. This was shown in the affirmative by Baumgartner in 1973 who showed the consistency of 'all $\aleph_1$-dense sets of reals are order isomorphic' where a set is $\kappa$-dense for a cardinal $\kappa$ if its intersection with any open interval has size $\kappa$. The above became known as Baumgartner's axiom, denoted BA, and is an important axiom in both combinatorial set theory and set theoretic topology. BA has natural higher dimensional analogues - i.e., statements with the same relation to $\mathbb R^n$ that BA has to $\mathbb R$. It is a long standing open conjecture of Steprāns and Watson that BA implies its higher dimensional analogues.

In the talk I will describe some attempts to break the ice on this open problem mostly by looking at a family of weaker and stronger variants of BA and investigating their combinatorial, analytic and topological consequences. We will show that while some weak variants of BA have all the same consequences as BA, even weaker ones do not. Meanwhile a strengthening of BA for Baire and Polish space gives much more information.

Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in $\textbf{ZFC}$. Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.

Measurable cardinals and other large cardinals on the larger side of things are characterized by the existence of elementary embeddings $j:V\to \mathcal M$ from the universe $V$ of sets into a transitive submodel $\mathcal M$. The clear pattern the large cardinals in that region follow is that the closer the submodel $\mathcal M$ is to $V$ the stronger the large cardinal notion. Smaller large cardinals, such as weakly compact or Ramsey cardinals, are known chiefly for their combinatorial properties, such as the existence of large homogeneous sets for colorings. But, it turns out that they too have elementary embeddings characterizations with embeddings on the correspondingly small models $M$ of (a fragment) of set theory (usually ${\rm ZFC}^-$, the theory ${\rm ZFC}$ with powerset axiom removed). Elementary embeddings of $V$ are often by-definable with the existence of certain ultrafilters or systems of ultrafilters. The classical example is that $\kappa$ is measurable if and only if there is a $\kappa$-complete ultrafilter on $\kappa$. The model $\mathcal M$ is then the transitive collapse of the ultrapower of $V$ by $U$. The connection between elementary embedding and ultrafilters also exists in the case of the small elementary embeddings. A typical elementary embedding characterization of a small large cardinal $\kappa$ follows the following template: for every $A\subseteq\kappa$, there is a (technical condition) model $M$, with $A\in M$, for which there is an $M$-ultrafilter $U$ on $\kappa$ with (technical properties). A subset $U\subseteq P(\kappa)\cap M$ is an $M$-ultrafilter if the structure $\langle M,\in, U\rangle$, with a predicate for $U$, satisfies that $U$ is a $\kappa$-complete ultrafilter on $\kappa$, meaning that $U$ measures all the sets in $M$ and its completeness applies to sequences that are elements of $M$. The reason we need to add a predicate for $U$ is that in most interesting case, and in contrast to the situation with measurable cardinals, $U$ is not an element of $M$ (indeed in most cases, $P(\kappa)$ does not exist in $M$). While the structure $M$ usually satisfies some large fragment of ${\rm ZFC}$, once, we add a predicate for the $M$-ultrafilter $U$, the structure $\langle M,\in, U\rangle$ can fail to satisfy even $\Sigma_0$-separation. In this talk, I will discuss how smaller large cardinals follow the pattern that the more set theory the structure $\langle M,\in, U\rangle$ satisfies the stronger the resulting large cardinal notion. I will use these observations to introduce a new hierarchy of large cardinals between Ramsey and measurable cardinals. This is joint work with Philipp Schlicht, based on earlier work by Bovykin and McKenzie.

Let $\mathcal{E}$ denote the $\sigma$-ideal generated by closed null sets on $\mathbb{R}$. We show that the uniformity and the covering of $\mathcal{E}$ can be added to Cichoń's maximum with distinct values, more specifically, it is consistent that $\aleph_1\lt\mathrm{add}(\mathcal{N})\lt\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal{N})\lt\mathfrak{b}\lt\mathrm{non}(\mathcal{E})\lt\mathrm{non}(\mathcal{M})\lt\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal{M})\lt\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal{E})\lt\mathfrak{d}\lt\mathrm{non}(\mathcal{N})\lt\mathrm{cof}(\mathcal{N})\lt2^{\aleph_0}$ holds.

Video

An Abelian lattice-ordered group (l-group) is an Abelian group with a lattice order that is invariant under translations. Examples include $C(X)$, the set of continuous real-valued functions on a topological space $X$ with pointwise operations and order, the $L_p$ spaces, and certain spaces of measures. After surveying some of the known decidability results for various classes of l-groups, I will present new decidability results concerning existentially closed l-groups.

Reinhardt embedding is an elementary embedding from $V$ to $V$ itself, whose existence was refuted under the Axiom of Choice by Kunen's famous theorem. There were attempts to get a consistent version of a Reinhardt embedding, and dropping the Axiom of Powerset is one possibility. Richard Matthews showed that $\mathsf{ZFC} + \mathrm{I}_1$ proves $\mathsf{ZFC}$ without Powerset is consistent with a Reinhardt embedding, but the embedding $j\colon V\to V$ in the Matthews' model does not satisfy the cofinality (i.e., for every set $a$ there is $b$ such that $a\in j(b)$). In this talk, I will show from $\mathsf{ZFC} + \mathrm{I}_0$ that $\mathsf{ZFC}$ without Powerset is consistent with a cofinal Reinhardt embedding.

Video

Last semester, I discussed geometric methods for decidability over a complete discrete valuation ring (DVR) in equal characteristic, suggesting that these methods could be applied effectively. In this talk, I aim to clarify the computability issues surrounding this topic while at the same time shifting focus to the case of mixed characteristic. Whereas quantifier elimination (QE) results are established for p-adic numbers, the general landscape remains less explored. I will demonstrate that for any existential sentence over a computable ring, we can effectively construct a positive existential (or Diophantine) sentence which is logically equivalent to the original in every excellent Henselian DVR containing the ring. This construction hinges on Resolution of Singularities, which is feasible in characteristic zero.

Furthermore, I will utilize ultraproducts, specifically the protoproduct variant, to show how Diophantine statements over a DVR can be reduced to those over a residue ring. Since the residue ring is Artinian—and in the case of p-adics, even finite—the associated problems become significantly more manageable. However, it is important to note that this approach does not yet yield a general QE result, as it applies only to sentences, not formulas. The challenge lies in the dependence of certain effective bounds on parameters. I will provide insights into how to derive a bound based on a refined notion of complexity within the equational system—beyond simply considering its degree—using ultraproducts. Additionally, I will address a request from the audience in my last talk by demonstrating that this bound is indeed effective.

And somehow it will also require some delving into the theory of Witt vectors and ancient elements, as I will explain.

Video

TBA

Video

TBA

Video